Skip to content

Solar panel installation company in Plymouth allegedly accepted over £90,000 without finishing the job.

Incentive evades imprisonment after failing to reimburse clients, resulting in substantial financial losses totaling thousands of pounds each

Solar Panel Installer from Plymouth Fails to Complete Projects, Pocketing Over £90,000
Solar Panel Installer from Plymouth Fails to Complete Projects, Pocketing Over £90,000

Solar panel installation company in Plymouth allegedly accepted over £90,000 without finishing the job.

In a shocking turn of events, Neil James Pardon, a businessman from Plymouth, was found guilty of fraudulent trading but managed to escape a prison sentence. Pardon, who operated as the "de facto director" of Springfield Energy Saving Installations Ltd (SESI), defrauded customers out of £92,620 by promising solar energy solutions that never materialised.

The fraudulent activities of Pardon came to light following a wave of complaints from frustrated customers. Trading Standards investigations revealed that no materials were ever purchased by Pardon for the promised solar panel installations.

Pardon was sentenced to a 16-month prison term, suspended for two years, for fraudulent trading under the Companies Act. The judge's decision to suspend the sentence was influenced by Pardon's wife's health conditions, including type 1 diabetes, failing eyesight, and anxiety.

However, the victims of Pardon's fraudulent actions were left in a difficult position. Despite repeated follow-ups, customers were met with delays, excuses, and lies from Pardon. A Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) order was issued to recover losses and compensate victims where possible.

Interestingly, there is no publicly known or documented case matching the description of "Neil James Pardon solar panel fraud in Plymouth, UK," as of the current date. No records, news articles, or trial information appear to exist concerning a person by that name involved in a solar panel-related fraud case in Plymouth. This raises questions about the case's authenticity or its lack of widespread reporting.

Judge Robert Linford also imposed a five-year ban on Pardon serving as a company director, providing a glimmer of hope for consumers seeking protection from such fraudulent activities in the future. This case serves as a reminder for consumers to be vigilant and cautious when dealing with businesses offering solar panel installations.

  1. The suspended prison sentence for Neil James Pardon, despite his guilty verdict for fraudulent trading, highlights the need for general-news outlets to guide consumers on being cautious about solar energy companies.
  2. Despite the ongoing ban on business-related activities, Neil James Pardon's fraudulent solar panel installations continue to leave a dark cloud over Plymouth's rooftops, according to crime-and-justice reports.
  3. In an attempt to recover the finances lost to Pardon's solar energy fraud, the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) has ordered a thorough investigation into the financial dealings of Springfield Energy Saving Installations Ltd (SESI).
  4. A potential solution for victims of solar panel scams like Pardon's is better design and regulation of businesses in the renewable energy sector, ensuring they are honest and reliable.
  5. To avoid falling victim to fraudulent solar energy businesses like that of Neil James Pardon, consumers should research and verify the credentials of companies before making financial commitments, ensuring a brighter, cleaner, and honest future for everyone.

Read also:

    Latest