Will the Digital Euro represent the future of currency for Europe, or is it a fruitless endeavor?
By 2025, the European Central Bank might introduce its own Virtual Euro, granting citizens direct access to central bank money digitally for the first time. This proposition, subject to parliamentary approval, seeks to modernize Europe's payment systems, diminish reliance on external providers, and preserve the euro's global relevance. Currently, the euro ranks second only to the U.S. dollar, comprising around 20% of global foreign exchange reserves and an impressive 31% of foreign exchange market turnover.
Doubters from various perspectives remain unconvinced. Some contend that the ECB's cautious approach shies away from addressing structural issues such as ingrained banking power, while other critics view it as an overreach of state intervention in a flourishing digital payments market. As the U.S. plans to prohibit retail CBDCs while China's Digital Yuan sets transaction records, Europe's Virtual Euro finds itself in a precarious position between these two extremes. Can it catalyze meaningful change, or will it remain a precarious compromise?
To understand this conundrum, I engaged with Ulrich Bindseil, the ECB's Director General of Market Infrastructures and Payments, and solicited insights from leading economists and policy analysts.
ECB’s Blockchain Ambition
"The growing share of electronic payments necessitates adaptation," suggests Mr. Bindseil. "For decades, central bank money and private money have coexisted—what reason have central banks for clinging to outdated methods now?"
The ECB foresees a safe, private Digital Euro, which can be used online or offline, accessed via digital wallets from banks or authorized intermediaries. No single European digital payment system covers the entire currency union, leaving many European regions reliant on non-European card networks. The ECB hopes the Digital Euro will reduce this dependency and bolster Europe's strategic autonomy.
To avoid destabilizing the banking sector, the ECB plans to impose holding limits and pay no interest on Digital Euro balances. This strategy aims to strike a balance—offering a public digital currency without drastically disrupting the financial banking landscape. The primary objective is to provide choice and assert Europe's strategic autonomy in a rapidly digitizing economy.
Regarding privacy, Bindseil is unequivocal: "Neither the ECB nor any EU institution will have direct access to individual user data. Payment service providers, not the central bank, will manage accounts. The offline version will aim to maintain the same level of anonymity as physical cash, ensuring privacy and security without becoming a surveillance tool."
CBDC Critics Question the Merits
Professor Dirk Niepelt of the University of Bern posits that the ECB could be more ambitious: "To truly revolutionize the market, a retail CBDC would need to reduce the societal costs. These societal costs encompass more than operational expenses. They also incorporate the broader, economy-wide costs stemming from the issues plaguing banks, which act as central payment service providers in today's monetary system. Addressing challenges such as excessive bank market power, fragility, and too-big-to-fail problems necessitates substantial resources—not required with a retail CBDC."
Dirk also suggests that a retail CBDC could address systemic issues and empower central banks to establish interest rates directly, as envisioned by economists John Barrdear and Michael Kumhof in a 2016 Bank of England Working Paper. However, Professor Dirk acknowledges the political-economic risks of expanding the central bank's balance sheet. But Bindseil dismisses interest-bearing proposals due to concerns about bank disintermediation and heightened run risks.
Critics like Nicholas Anthony of the Cato Institute dismiss the necessity of a retail CBDC. In Nicholas's words, "The primary issue with CBDCs is that they do not address any problems that are not already being addressed within the market. To the extent that there are any benefits of CBDCs, those benefits fall into the hands of government officials seeking more surveillant control over the use of money."
Brunello Rosa, Honorary Visiting Professor at City, University of London, presents a differing perspective. "The Digital Euro could assert strategic autonomy," he says, adding that it could stimulate innovation among banks. "Safe, public digital money can instill trust in the broader digital asset ecosystem, allowing stablecoins and other private solutions to flourish alongside it."
A Worldwide Contest for Crypto Dominance
The ECB is treading a challenging landscape where nearly every G20 country is investigating a Central Bank Digital Currency. Of the 20 nations, 19 are in advanced stages of CBDC exploration, with 13 already conducting pilot programs. Notable among these are Brazil, Japan, India, Australia, Russia, and Turkey, each testing their digital currencies to streamline payments and assert economic independence.
The Chinese Digital Yuan vs. Europe's Steady Stride
China is leading the CBDC race with its Digital Yuan, which has already surpassed $1 trillion in transactions. This rollout underscores China's determination to establish a public digital currency as a cornerstone of its payment infrastructure, showcasing its ambition to create a state-backed payment system. However, critics argue that the Digital Yuan could also function as a tool for enhancing state surveillance, sparking debates about privacy and the appropriate balance between public and private roles in innovation, as well as individual freedoms.
Europe's deliberate approach seeks to achieve strategic autonomy without overshadowing the private sector or infringing on personal privacy. The Digital Euro is envisioned as a complementary public digital currency payment solution, designed to coexist with existing private payment systems. This strategy ostensibly seeks to ensure financial stability and reduce reliance on non-European payment networks. However, this measured approach has faced criticism from all sides—some argue it lacks the audacity necessary to have a significant impact, while others view it as an unnecessary intervention into a domain better left to the private sector.
In contrast to many other nations, the United States has decided against introducing a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC), voicing concerns over privacy, financial stability, and the balance between public and private market roles. This puts the U.S. in an unique spot within the G20, where most countries are actively pushing their digital currency projects. Those who support this stance say it avoids too much government intrusion in a already competitive private payments market, but critics worry it might leave the U.S. lagging behind in the worldwide digital currency innovation race.
Autonomous Strategy and 2025 Trends
Europe's strategy aims to achieve autonomy by reducing reliance on foreign intermediaries and non-European payment systems. By setting limits on holdings and not offering interest on Digital Euro balances, the ECB aims to prevent bank disintermediation and maintain stability. Critics contest that this could make the Digital Euro less competitive against existing private payment solutions and hamper its ability to tackle deep-rooted issues within the financial sector.
By 2025, major economies will have been testing CBDCs, and Europe will decide whether to unveil the Digital Euro or let the private market flourish, following the U.S. approach. The ECB's current strategy aims for a public digital currency introduction with minimal disruption, but it's unsure whether this cautious approach can allow the Digital Euro to succeed amid intense global private payment initiatives.
A successful Digital Euro could boost Europe's financial autonomy and build trust in the digital era. If not, it might turn out to be an ineffectual compromise—too passive to bring about significant change and too weak to compete on the global stage.
With the majority of G20 nations progressing with their CBDC projects, Europe's Digital Euro must find a balance between public and private sectors. The ECB's careful strategy seeks strategic autonomy and financial stability, but it faces pressure to demonstrate its relevance and competitiveness. Only time will tell if the Digital Euro becomes a crucial component of Europe's financial future or a mere footnote in the global digital currency competition.
The U.S., following its plans to prohibit retail CBDCs, joins the group of critics questioning the merits of the ECB's Digital Euro. A Bank of England Working Paper by economists John Barrdear and Michael Kumhof suggests that a retail CBDC could allow central banks to establish interest rates directly, but this proposition raises concerns about bank disintermediation and heightened run risks.
Cryptocurrency advocates argue that a Digital Euro could boost trust in the broader digital asset ecosystem, allowing stablecoins and other private solutions to flourish. However, some critics view the ECB's approach as less ambitious and potentially less competitive than existing private payment solutions.
Meanwhile, China's Digital Yuan continues to set transaction records, establishing a public digital currency as a cornerstone of its payment infrastructure. Although critics warn of potential surveillance tools, China's determined implementation could put pressure on other countries, including Europe, to swiftly address their own CBDCs.
Moreover, as other G20 countries progress with their CBDC projects, the ECB's cautious strategy and decision to delay the introduction of the Digital Euro faces pressure to demonstrate its relevance and competitiveness within this evolving landscape. The success of Europe's Digital Euro in maintaining strategic autonomy and financial stability while competing against global private payment initiatives remains to be seen.
