Skip to content

Reasons to Maintain the Tax Break for State and Local Business Taxes:

Eliminating or reducing the deduction for state and local business taxes (B-SALT deduction) would undermine the growth-promoting measures of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Four Justifications for Maintaining the Tax Deduction for State and Local Business Taxes
Four Justifications for Maintaining the Tax Deduction for State and Local Business Taxes

Reasons to Maintain the Tax Break for State and Local Business Taxes:

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), passed in December 2017, marked a significant overhaul in tax legislation since 1986. Among its many provisions, the TCJA reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and introduced a new 20% deduction for pass-through business income. However, recent debates surround the deductibility of state and local business taxes (B-SALT deduction), a topic that has significant implications for American businesses and the broader economy.

For businesses, particularly pass-through entities like partnerships and S-corporations, common in sectors such as finance, law, professional services, and health care, the limitation or cap on the SALT deduction increases the federal tax burden. These entities often face higher federal taxes when their state and local business taxes are no longer fully deductible. The removal of a previously available deduction that lowered taxable income means businesses pay more federal tax, reducing after-tax cash flow and potentially limiting reinvestment and hiring capacity.

The challenge is compounded by legislative efforts to curtail SALT cap workarounds such as Pass-Through Entity Taxes (PTETs), impacting business owners disproportionately in states with higher state and local taxes.

Economically, for states with high state and local taxes, such as New York and California, limiting SALT deductions tightens state budgets by reducing the incentive effects on taxpayers and discouraging local tax compliance or investment. This can exacerbate budget shortfalls, forcing states to issue more municipal bonds to cover deficits, which puts upward pressure on yields and increases borrowing costs.

The SALT cap also creates fiscal tensions between high-tax states and the federal government, potentially influencing where businesses choose to locate and invest. The limitation of B-SALT deductions can lead to reduced economic growth in affected regions by increasing the overall tax burden on businesses and discouraging investment.

Recent Senate proposals have temporarily increased the SALT deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 before reverting back. However, changes specifically limiting business SALT deductions, especially on pass-through entities, remain a sticking point and a concern for many business owners.

In conclusion, limiting the B-SALT deduction raises federal taxes for many businesses, particularly in service and professional sectors concentrated in high-tax states, thereby increasing their cost of capital and potentially slowing economic activity. It also contributes to fiscal pressures at the state level and reshapes investment markets, including municipal bonds, with broad economic repercussions. The ongoing debate surrounding this issue underscores its importance and the need for careful consideration of its implications.

  1. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a significant change in tax policy, reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and introduced a 20% deduction for pass-through business income.
  2. For small businesses, particularly those in the finance, law, professional services, and health care sectors, the limitation on the SALT deduction increases the federal tax burden.
  3. The SALT cap can lead to reduced cash flow for businesses, potentially limiting their ability to reinvest and hire.
  4. Legislative efforts to curtail SALT cap workarounds, such as Pass-Through Entity Taxes, impact business owners disproportionately in states with higher state and local taxes.
  5. The SALT cap can exacerbate budget shortfalls in states like New York and California, forcing them to issue more municipal bonds and increasing borrowing costs.
  6. The limitation of business SALT deductions can influence where businesses choose to locate and invest, potentially reducing economic growth in affected regions.
  7. Recent Senate proposals have temporarily increased the SALT deduction cap, but changes specifically limiting business SALT deductions, especially on pass-through entities, remain a concern for many.
  8. Advocacy groups and chambers of commerce are actively engaging in politics to address the concerns of business owners and the impact of the SALT cap on the economy and finance.
  9. The environment for commerce and economic growth is under increased scrutiny due to the ongoing debate surrounding business SALT deductions and the role of government policy in shaping investment landscapes.
  10. The policy-and-legislation segment of general news is alive with discussions about the SALT cap and its implications for businesses, economy, and politics as the debate continues.

Read also:

    Latest