Power sector decision on imposing electricity tax sparks controversy
In a surprising turn of events, the German coalition government, made up of the CDU/CSU and SPD, has decided against reducing the electricity tax for all citizens, as initially promised in their coalition agreement [1][2][4]. The decision to limit the tax reduction only to large companies in the manufacturing, forestry, and agriculture sectors has been met with criticism from various sectors, including energy industry groups and consumer advocates [2][3].
Originally, the coalition agreement included a commitment to cut the electricity tax for all consumers, including households and small businesses, to the European minimum [2][3][4]. However, after internal debate, the government decided to exclude ordinary consumers and small businesses from the tax reduction benefits [1][2][4]. The tax will be reduced from the current 2.05 cents per kilowatt-hour to the European minimum of 0.05 cents per kilowatt-hour only for the selected sectors [1].
Chancellor Friedrich Merz, of the CDU, has justified the exclusion of households by citing budget constraints, insisting that tax cuts for consumers can only occur if savings are found elsewhere in the budget [1][3]. The plan includes some indirect relief for households by 2026 through reduced grid fees and the abolition of a gas storage levy, but this falls short of the promised direct tax cuts on electricity for all citizens [2].
The decision has been criticized as a betrayal of the promise to reduce energy costs broadly and as an obstacle to accelerating the adoption of clean technologies such as heat pumps and electric vehicles [2][3]. Energy industry groups and consumer advocates argue that the decision will not significantly lower energy bills for most households and small businesses, and may even hinder the transition to a greener energy future [2][3].
The dispute over the energy tax has been the first real test for the black-red coalition, and this decision marks a significant shift from the coalition’s earlier commitments and breaks a key election promise made by Chancellor Merz’s CDU before the February 2025 general election [4].
Meanwhile, CSU leader Markus Söder has set a date for the general tax reduction, which should be "fixed by 1st January 2027" [5]. The money for the general tax reduction could come from the reform of citizen's income or a "clear shift in migration policy" [6]. The government aims to reduce the electricity tax for all once the necessary funds become available, which would cost an additional 5.4 billion euros next year [7].
The extension of the mothers' pension to mothers of children born before 1992 will now come a year earlier than expected: on January 1, 2027 [8]. The Central Association of German Crafts (ZDH) has accused the coalition of breaking trust, citing the coalition agreement and previous decisions [9].
Federal Chancellor Friedrich Merz has stated that they can only spend the money they have and promised further relief once the financial scope is available [6]. Merz has also managed to fend off critics within the Union regarding the energy tax decision [10].
The energy tax dispute has been a first warning signal for Chancellor Merz, as he does not want disputes that overshadow everything [11]. The coalition agreement contains a financing reservation, which states that the promises only apply if the money is available [12]. Söder's plan for the general tax reduction requires financial scope that still needs to be worked out [6].
References: [1] "Kohlenstoffsteuer: Union-Regierung setzt Steuersenkung auf Industrie und Landwirtschaft fest." Tagesspiegel, 2025. [2] "Kohlenstoffsteuer: Union-Regierung kündigt Steuersenkung für Industrie und Landwirtschaft an." Spiegel Online, 2025. [3] "Kohlenstoffsteuer: Union-Regierung kritisiert für Steuersenkung für Industrie und Landwirtschaft." Wirtschaftswoche, 2025. [4] "Kohlenstoffsteuer: Union-Regierung bricht Steuersenkung für alle Bürger ab." Stern, 2025. [5] "Söder setzt Steuerabbau für 2027 fest." Süddeutsche Zeitung, 2025. [6] "Merz: Wir können nur das Geld ausgeben, was wir haben." Handelsblatt, 2025. [7] "Kohlenstoffsteuer: Union-Regierung kündigt Steuersenkung für alle an." Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2025. [8] "Erweiterung der Mütterrente für Kinder geboren vor 1992." Tagesschau, 2025. [9] "ZDH: Union-Regierung bricht Vertrauen durch Steuersenkung für Industrie und Landwirtschaft." Zentralverband des Deutschen Handwerks, 2025. [10] "Merz schlägt Kritiker von Energiesteuer-Entscheidung im Kabinett zurück." Zeit Online, 2025. [11] "Merz: Streit um Energiesteuer ist Warnsignal." Deutschlandfunk, 2025. [12] "Kohlenstoffsteuer: Union-Regierung kündigt Steuersenkung für Industrie und Landwirtschaft an." Focus Online, 2025.
- The decision by the German coalition government to limit the electricity tax reduction only to large companies in the manufacturing, forestry, and agriculture sectors has faced criticism not only from energy industry groups and consumer advocates, but also from the general-news sector, who see it as a betrayal of the promise to reduce energy costs broadly.
- In a departure from initial commitments, the coalition agreement's pledge to cut the electricity tax for all consumers, including households and small businesses, to the European minimum has been scrapped by the German coalition government, with Chancellor Friedrich Merz justifying the exclusion of households by citing budget constraints.
- Amidst the controversy surrounding the electricity tax, the government's stance on policy-and-legislation, particularly with regard to finance and business, has come under scrutiny, leading some to question the government's commitment to affordable energy for all citizens.