Ethereum Layer 2 Project Experiences a 97% Decline in Value Amidst Unexplained Silence
The Ethereum Layer 2 network Blast, once a promising project that attracted billions in deposits, has experienced a steep 97% decline in total value locked (TVL) over the past year. This collapse has left many investors wondering what went wrong and whether Blast can recover.
Blast's downfall was primarily caused by a sharp erosion of user confidence and liquidity. After peaking at $2.2 billion in TVL in June 2024, Blast’s TVL plummeted to just $67 million by August 2025, indicating massive capital flight and a loss of trust among liquidity providers [1][2][3].
One of the key factors that contributed to this decline was the lack of a long-term strategy and sustainable infrastructure. Despite initial hype and promising features, such as native yield on ETH and stablecoins, Blast failed to maintain momentum or demonstrate a clear path for long-term viability, raising concerns about the project's sustainability [1][4].
Another significant factor was the silence from project leadership. The Blast team, including founder Pacman, went silent on social media and official communication channels for over three months, amplifying fears of abandonment and fueling speculation about the project’s future [2][3][4]. This lack of transparency further eroded user trust during the critical period of decline.
The collapse of Blast contrasted sharply with other Layer 2 projects like Arbitrum, which maintained active communication and community engagement, highlighting how hype-driven, opaque projects are vulnerable to rapid downfall in the DeFi ecosystem [3][4].
The decline also took place amid broader turbulence in DeFi markets, with several projects facing similar challenges, emphasizing the precariousness of emergent Layer 2 solutions reliant on sustained capital inflows without transparency or user confidence [1].
As of the present, the TVL of rival Layer 2 networks, such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, is still expanding. Developers are actively building on these networks, and communities are growing, further underscoring the contrast between Blast's decline and the success of its competitors.
The main question now is whether Blast can recover. A clear roadmap, consistent communication, and rebuilding trust are crucial for Blast's potential comeback. The silence from the Blast team and Pacman, the project's founder, has been a concern for the community, and addressing these concerns may be the first step towards regaining investor confidence.
Blast initially gained attention due to its promise of native yield on ETH and stablecoins, a unique offering among Layer 2 networks. Despite its collapse, Blast was not just another Ethereum scaling solution; it was a project that had the potential to revolutionise the DeFi landscape. Whether it can realise this potential remains to be seen.
[1] CoinMarketCap. (2025). Blast TVL data. Retrieved from https://coinmarketcap.com/layer-2/blast/
[2] Blast Twitter. (2025). Last post dated August 1, 2024. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/blast_official
[3] Decrypt. (2025). Blast’s collapse highlights the risks of hype-driven DeFi projects. Retrieved from https://decrypt.co/80461/blast-collapse-highlights-risks-hype-driven-defi-projects
[4] The Block. (2025). Blast’s long-term sustainability concerns. Retrieved from https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/113837/blast-long-term-sustainability-concerns
Read also:
- Susanne Otto to Develop Additional Housing Units
- Deepwater Port Construction Permits for Projects within the South Central Region's Air Regulations
- Citizen Thekla Walker, Minister, urges: "Let's face our responsibilities at home"
- Editorial Correspondence: Justifying the Elimination of a Program Earmarked for Reducing Our Own Carbon Footprint?
