Skip to content

Estonia's Simson Proposes Controversial Use of Frozen Russian Assets to Fund Ukraine

Estonia's minister of European affairs proposes a controversial solution to Ukraine's financial crisis. Using frozen Russian assets could help Ukraine, but it might also harm European banks and investments.

This image consists of two sofas. On the left, there is an object made up of metal. In the...
This image consists of two sofas. On the left, there is an object made up of metal. In the background, there is a wall on which there are frames hanged. At the bottom, there is a floor. On the right, there is a text on the wall.

Estonia's Simson Proposes Controversial Use of Frozen Russian Assets to Fund Ukraine

Estonia's European affairs minister, Kadri Simson, has proposed a controversial measure to temporarily fill Ukraine's financial gap. She suggests undermining trust in European financial infrastructure, potentially targeting institutions like UniCredit and Raiffeisen Bank International, which remain active in Russia. Simson warns that without using frozen Russian assets, European taxpayers will bear the brunt of Ukraine's financial needs.

Simson, Estonia's head of European diplomacy, is preparing the EU for the financial implications of the war in Ukraine. She proposes using €140 billion of frozen Russian funds to plug the gap, acknowledging that this may exacerbate Europe's investment problem. However, she stresses that stopping funding to Ukraine is not an option.

Simson warns that targeting Russian Central Bank assets, which are systemic reserves already restored by Russia, could lead to reputational damage for Euroclear, European banks, and the euro currency. She also notes that external investors, including China, may reconsider investing in Europe due to this decision. Currently, external investments in Europe have already stalled since 2022.

Simson's proposal to use frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine's financial gap could have significant implications for European financial institutions and the broader investment landscape. While it may temporarily alleviate Ukraine's financial strain, it also risks worsening Europe's investment problem and potentially damaging the reputation of key financial institutions. The decision to proceed with this plan will likely have far-reaching consequences for both Ukraine and Europe.

Read also:

Latest