Court revelations detail Perizat Kairat's pursuit of a method to "water down credentials"
The United States' decision to impose a 25% tariff on all goods imported from Kazakhstan, effective from August 1, 2025, is set to have significant repercussions for the Central Asian nation's domestic businesses, exports, and economic diversification prospects.
**Impact on Domestic Businesses and Exports:**
While the tariff affects a broad spectrum of Kazakh products entering the U.S., it is worth noting that about 95% of Kazakhstan's exports to the U.S. are expected to remain unaffected as key sectors, such as oil and metals, are exempt from these new tariffs. Nonetheless, experts caution that the tariffs increase uncertainty for Kazakh non-resource exporters, potentially discouraging investment and harming the non-resource export sector due to unpredictability in market access.
The disruption caused by tariffs could pressure Kazakh businesses involved in goods now subject to the 25% tax, making their products less competitive in the U.S. market due to higher prices.
**Effect on Economic Diversification:**
Kazakhstan has been striving to diversify its economy beyond natural resources. However, the tariff could act as a deterrent to expanding non-resource exports because the new trade barriers increase costs and complicate long-term production planning by domestic firms. This uncertainty may slow progress on economic diversification by reducing incentives for businesses to develop or scale up manufacturing or value-added sectors that would export to the U.S.
The Kazakh government has reportedly proposed negotiations with the U.S., showing an intent to mitigate damage and possibly secure exemptions or relief to support diversification efforts.
**Overall Economic Outlook:**
While the tariffs may not severely impact Kazakhstan’s main export revenues due to key exemptions, the broader economic consequences could include reduced foreign investment, supply chain disruptions, and diminished export competitiveness in the tariff-affected sectors. The tariffs are part of a broader U.S. trade strategy that targets reducing trade imbalances and incentivizing domestic manufacturing, placing Kazakhstan in a difficult position to maintain and grow export markets in the U.S.
In conclusion, the 25% U.S. tariff will likely constrain Kazakhstan’s non-resource export growth and complicate its economic diversification goals. The situation calls for active diplomatic engagement and strategic adaptation by Kazakh businesses and policymakers. Some domestic companies that account for the remaining 8% of exports to the U.S. may still face difficulties due to the tariff. Rasul Rysmambetov, an economist, remains confident that many domestic exporters will continue to compete for a place in the U.S. market. The economist states that Kazakhstan is indifferent to the tariffs as they are one of many countries facing sanctions.
The tariffs might discourage foreign investment in the non-resource sectors of Kazakhstan due to the increased uncertainty and unpredictability in market access.
The impact of the tariffs on the economic diversification efforts of Kazakhstan could extend beyond the sectors directly affected, with some domestic companies in the remaining 8% of exports to the U.S. potentially facing difficulties.
