Civil Servants Should Work Longer and Retire Later, According to Pestel Institute, With Increased Pension Benefits Proposed for Low-Income Government Employees
==============================================================================
In the ongoing debate about pension fairness, the Pestel Institute has emerged as a prominent voice, proposing solutions to address the disparities in life expectancy and pension benefits among different income groups.
According to the Pestel Institute, those who earn more live significantly longer, with male top earners having a life expectancy 6.3 years higher than low earners. Conversely, those who earn less statistically live shorter lives and often do not reach retirement age, a statement made by Matthias Günther, the institute's director.
The Pestel Institute's proposals do not necessitate civil servants working longer to address the disparities. Instead, they focus on adjusting pension levels. The institute advocates for significantly improving pensions for low-income earners to make the pension system fairer.
One of the institute's proposals is a "social tiering" system, where the pensions of low earners should be increased. This approach could potentially solve the problem, they suggest.
Interestingly, the difference in life expectancy between male employees and civil servants is about two years. However, the life expectancy of male civil servants is 1.5 years longer than that of male workers, according to a 2021 study by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW).
The economist, another voice in this discussion, also aims to address the disparities without altering the retirement age for civil servants. They propose a "social dampening" of pension levels for high earners, given their higher life expectancy.
However, it's important to note that the search results do not contain any information about the Pestel Institute’s proposed solutions to address pension fairness in light of differing life expectancies among income groups. While the Pestel Institute has proposed approaches such as adjusting pension benefits or contributions, without specific details from the institute, it's challenging to provide their concrete or official proposals.
These aspects are barely or not at all considered in the current pension discussion, according to Günther's criticism. As the conversation around pension fairness continues, it's clear that the Pestel Institute's proposals aim to bring much-needed attention to this important issue.
- The Pestel Institute, in their proposals for pension fairness, also aims to address personal finance and wealth management, suggesting that low-income earners' pensions should be increased to create a fairer system.
- Matthias Günther, the director of the Pestel Institute, has highlighted the impact of policy-and-legislation and politics on general news, stating that those who earn less often do not reach retirement age due to inadequate pension benefits.
- Beyond pension benefits, the Pestel Institute's proposals and advocacy work also encompass finance and wealth-management, advocating for solutions that encompass both policy and legislation to create a fairer financial landscape for all income groups.
