Assessments of Initial Consumer Regulatory Decisions

Assessments of Initial Consumer Regulatory Decisions

The new regulatory regime for English social housing providers is placing a significant emphasis on energy efficiency, sustainability, affordability, and consumer protection. This shift is evident in the grading system, with only one local authority (LA) receiving a C1 grade, while 69% have been assigned a C3 grade, indicating 'serious failings'.

The key driver for these grades is the minimum energy efficiency standards (MEES). The government is proposing that socially rented homes in England must achieve an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating of at least Band C by April 2030. This aligns with similar standards proposed for the private rented sector, where new tenancies must have EPC Band C from December 2025, and existing tenancies must meet this standard by 2028.

The regulations aim to address fuel poverty, reduce carbon emissions, and make homes easier to heat. They also consider what is "cost-effective and affordable" for social landlords when enforcing the standards for existing tenancies. Improving energy efficiency helps reduce heating costs for vulnerable tenants, contributing to affordability and tenant well-being.

In addition to energy efficiency, the new regulatory regime focuses on ensuring fair, transparent landlord practices. Under the evolving consumer protection framework, such as the DMCCA, the focus is on ensuring landlords provide fair terms and accurate information, avoiding unfair practices that harm tenants.

Half of the housing associations (HAs) graded so far have received a C1, with only one receiving a C3. The next largest share belongs to C3, which indicates 'serious failings', with 35%. The most common weaknesses identified in C3s include incomplete and out-of-date data on health and safety, failure to meet health and safety regulations or improve performance, outdated or incomplete stock condition data, poor data accuracy impeding effective prioritisation of stock investment, not meeting timeliness and quality standards for repairs service, significant and persistent numbers of outstanding repairs, poor or declining tenant engagement, inadequate complaint handling.

Across the nine C1s to date, there are numerous examples of organizations demonstrating that they have self-identified issues and that they can demonstrate better outcomes for residents arising from the improvement actions taken. The language in a C1 reflects that in the definitions of the Consumer Standards, with examples of evidenced assurance of appropriate systems to ensure health and safety of tenants, independent external assurance over health and safety processes, maintaining accurate and up-to-date stock condition information, understanding of tall buildings informing risks assessment and mitigation, demonstrated learning from performance data to drive improvements, delivering an effective, efficient, and timely repairs service, examples provided of improvements made as a result of customer scrutiny, provision of accessible performance information to support effective tenant scrutiny, accessible complaints handling approach that is publicized to tenants, evidence of learning from complaint types and outcomes to make improvements, evidence of treating tenants with fairness and respect, evidence of using understanding of diverse needs of tenants in the design of services to deliver fair and equitable outcomes.

The most common weaknesses identified in C2s include improvements needed in understanding and monitoring remedial health and safety actions and compliance. C2 'definitely on-a-journey' example language indicates the Regulator requiring ongoing monitoring to gain the lacking assurance that outcomes will improve.

In awarding a C1 to nine Housing Associations (HAs) to date, the Regulator has concluded that they are delivering the outcomes of the consumer standards and have demonstrated that they identify when issues occur and put plans in place to remedy and minimize recurrence. Weakness in meeting the Transparency, Influence and Accountability Standard are cited in 50% of the C3s awarded to date.

The new regulatory regime for English social housing providers has been in place for six months. The regime introduces proactive regulation and grading of the Consumer Standards, reflecting increasing regulatory emphasis on quality, sustainability, transparency, and consumer fairness in social housing supply.

1. The housing industry is undergoing a shift in focus, with social housing providers requiring increased emphasis on energy efficiency, sustainability, affordability, and consumer protection, as dictated by the new regulatory regime.
2. The shift has been fueled by the minimum energy efficiency standards (MEES), with the government expecting socially rented homes in England to achieve an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating of at least Band C by April 2030.
3. As part of the new regime, the focus is not only on energy efficiency but also on ensuring fair, transparent landlord practices, with a focus on providing fair terms and accurate information to tenants.
4. Investing in wealth-management and personal-finance should consider the impact of changes in the housing industry, such as the new regulatory regime, as it may influence long-term investments and affordability for tenants.

Read also: