Analyzing Corporate Multiple (EV/EBITDA): A Comprehensive Guide to Financial Appraisal

Analyzing Corporate Multiple (EV/EBITDA): A Comprehensive Guide to Financial Appraisal

Dollar General, a leading discount retailer, has seen its enterprise multiple increase over the past year, despite concerns about potential value traps. As of April 4, 2022, the company's enterprise multiple stands at 18.2, calculated using the formula Enterprise Multiple = EBITDA / EV (Enterprise Value).

The enterprise multiple is a financial metric that evaluates a company's value, including debt and excluding cash. It is a more comprehensive measure than market capitalization alone, as it captures the full economic value of a company, considering both its debts and available cash.

For Dollar General, the enterprise value as of the same period was $56.2 billion (market cap) + $14.25 billion (total debt) - $344.8 million (cash). The EBITDA for the trailing 12 months (TTM) was $3.86 billion.

The rise in Dollar General's enterprise multiple is primarily due to a nearly $1 billion cash decrease and a $300 million drop in EBITDA. However, it's essential to understand the key drivers for the company and industry when assessing a stock's actual value.

Value traps occur when forward multiples look overly cheap, but the projected EBITDA is too high, and the stock price has already fallen, reflecting the market's cautiousness. Investors should examine expected (forward) profitability to determine if projections pass the test. Forward multiples should be lower than TTM multiples to avoid value traps.

Enterprise multiples can differ significantly across industries. For instance, higher multiples are observed in high-growth sectors, such as biotech, while lower multiples are seen in slow-growth sectors, like railways.

When evaluating a company for acquisition, enterprise value and the EV/EBITDA multiple are generally preferred because they provide a capital-structure-neutral measure of the company's total economic value and operating profitability. This allows better comparison across companies with different debt levels and financial policies.

In contrast, market capitalization only reflects the total equity value of a company, i.e., the market value of its outstanding shares. It does not consider debt or cash levels, making comparisons less complete for acquisition since acquirers assume debt obligations and gain cash assets.

In conclusion, the enterprise multiple is a valuable tool for transnational comparisons and finding attractive takeover candidates. It offers a holistic view of the company’s value and operating earnings unaffected by financing decisions, making it preferred over market capitalization alone in acquisition assessments.

[1] Investopedia. (2021). Enterprise Multiple. [online] Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprisemultiple.asp [2] Investopedia. (2021). EBITDA. [online] Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/ebitda.asp [3] Investopedia. (2021). Enterprise Value (EV). [online] Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/enterprisevalue.asp [4] Investopedia. (2021). Market Capitalization. [online] Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp [5] Investopedia. (2021). Merger and Acquisition (M&A). [online] Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mergerandacquisition.asp

1. Despite Dollar General's enterprise multiple increase, concerns about value traps persist, as the decrease in cash and drop in EBITDA have primarily driven the rise. Yet, understanding Key drivers and industry trends is crucial when assessing a stock's worth.
2. Enterprise multiples, a comprehensive financial metric capturing a company's complete economic value, are preferred over market capitalization in acquisition assessments. This is because they provide a capital-structure-neutral measure of total economic value and operating profitability.
3. Unlike market capitalization, which only reflects equity value, enterprise value considers debt and cash levels. This makes enterprise multiple a valuable tool for finding attractive takeover candidates and transnational comparisons.

Read also: